Reply to Sudbery, Shardlow and Huntington : holding therapy Journal
Material type:
TextPublication details: British Journal of Social Work 2012Description: Journal articleISSN: 0045-3102Subject(s): Social work | Attachment disorder - TreatmentDDC classification: Journals Online access: Open e-book (Ruskin students only) Summary: Sudbery, Shardlow and Huntington (2010) reported interview data that gave a positive view of holding therapy, and argued that rejection of this treatment has been inappropriate. The present short paper notes the problem of defining holding therapy, critiques the existing outcome research that has been presented in support of the method and describes serious problems related to the conclusions drawn by Sudbery et al., as well as updating information about publications that reject holding therapy.
| Item type | Current library | Home library | Class number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item reservations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Article
|
Electronic publication | Electronic publication | Available |
Total reservations: 0
<p>British Journal of Social Work Vol. 42 no. 3 (Apr 2012), p. 556-559</p> <p>Available in library. See journal shelves.</p> <p>Available online.</p>
Sudbery, Shardlow and Huntington (2010) reported interview data that gave a positive view of holding therapy, and argued that rejection of this treatment has been inappropriate. The present short paper notes the problem of defining holding therapy, critiques the existing outcome research that has been presented in support of the method and describes serious problems related to the conclusions drawn by Sudbery et al., as well as updating information about publications that reject holding therapy.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.