000 | 03077cam a2200541Ki 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 715332 | ||
005 | 20230120125439.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
008 | 190821s2018 xx o 000 0 eng d | ||
020 |
_a9781351244510 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
020 |
_a1351244515 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
020 |
_a9781351244480 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket) |
||
020 |
_a1351244485 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket) |
||
020 |
_a9781351244503 _q(electronic bk. : PDF) |
||
020 |
_a1351244507 _q(electronic bk. : PDF) |
||
020 |
_a9781351244497 _q(electronic bk. : EPUB) |
||
020 |
_a1351244493 _q(electronic bk. : EPUB) |
||
020 | _z0815372981 | ||
020 | _z9780815372981 | ||
035 | _a(FlBoTFG)9781351244510 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)1112671666 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC-P)1112671666 | ||
040 |
_aOCoLC-P _beng _erda _epn _cOCoLC-P |
||
050 | 4 | _aQH332 | |
072 | 7 |
_aMED _x050000 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPHI _x000000 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPHI _x005000 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2bicssc |
|
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a174.2 _223 |
100 | 1 | _aNapier, Stephen E. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aUNCERTAIN BIOETHICS : _bhuman dignity and moral risk. |
264 | 1 |
_a[Place of publication not identified] : _bROUTLEDGE, _c2018. |
|
300 | _a1 online resource (1 volume) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 1 | _aRoutledge annals of bioethics | |
520 | _aBioethics is a field of inquiry and as such is fundamentally an epistemic discipline. Knowing how we make moral judgments can bring into relief why certain arguments on various bioethical issues appear plausible to one side and obviously false to the other. Uncertain Bioethics makes a significant and distinctive contribution to the bioethics literature by culling the insights from contemporary moral psychology to highlight the epistemic pitfalls and distorting influences on our apprehension of value. Stephen Napier also incorporates research from epistemology addressing pragmatic encroachment and the significance of peer disagreement to justify what he refers to as epistemic diffidence when one is considering harming or killing human beings. Napier extends these developments to the traditional bioethical notion of dignity and argues that beliefs subject to epistemic diffidence should not be acted upon. He proceeds to apply this framework to traditional and developing issues in bioethics including abortion, stem cell research, euthanasia, decision-making for patients in a minimally conscious state, and risky research on competent human subjects. | ||
588 | _aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aBioethics _xPhilosophy. |
|
650 | 7 |
_aMEDICAL / Ethics _2bisacsh |
|
650 | 7 |
_aPHILOSOPHY / General _2bisacsh |
|
650 | 7 |
_aPHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy _2bisacsh |
|
856 | 4 | 0 |
_3Taylor & Francis _uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351244510 |
856 | 4 | 2 |
_3OCLC metadata license agreement _uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf |
942 | _n0 | ||
999 |
_c60808 _d60808 |