| 000 | 01935nam a2200361 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 707088 | ||
| 005 | 20210719182819.0 | ||
| 008 | 190730s2020 enk f b 001|0|eng|d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780415792714 (pbk.) : _c£36.99 |
||
| 020 |
_z9781315211442 (ebook) : _cNo price |
||
| 035 | _a(StDuBDS)9780415792714 | ||
| 040 |
_aStDuBDS _beng _cStDuBDS _erda |
||
| 072 | 7 |
_aHEA _2eflch |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHEA _2ukslc |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a610.7'3'072 _223 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aLipscomb, Martin, _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aNursing literature reviews : _ba reflection / _cMartin Lipscomb. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _c2020. |
|
| 300 |
_axvi, 165 pages ; _c25 cm |
||
| 336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _aIncludes QR code. | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | 8 | _aLiterature reviews are undertaken by students, researchers, clinicians, and educationalists - that is, almost all nurses. Despite much excellent work, exploring the assumptions and practices that constitute searching for and reviewing literature has merit, and prompting those who undertake these activities to think critically about what it is that they are doing should be encouraged. Widely adopted approaches to structuring reviews (the 'standard model') can detrimentally limit the scope or range of literature that is accessed and appraised. It is further proposed that a lack of professional ambition or confidence invests aspects of the way some nurses engage with the sources that are available to them. Across the book, parochialism is challenged. The crucial roles that values and judgement play in reviews are highlighted. | |
| 521 | _aSpecialized. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aNursing _xResearch. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aNursing _xResearch _xMethodology. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aNursing literature. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aHealth and Fitness. _2eflch |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aHealth and Wellbeing. _2ukslc |
|
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c54802 _d54802 |
||