Why do nations matter? The struggle for belonging and security in an uncertain world Journal
Material type: TextPublication details: British Journal of Sociology 2013Description: Journal articleISSN: 1468-4446Subject(s): National identity | NationalismDDC classification: Journals Online access: Open e-book (Ruskin students only) Summary: This paper explores the reasons why national forms of identification and organization (might) matter in the contemporary era. In contrast to the majority of macro-sociological work dealing with this topic, I develop an analytical framework that draws together recent research on everyday nationalism with micro-sociological and psychological studies pointing to the importance of routine practices, institutional arrangements and symbolic systems in contributing to a relatively settled sense of identity, place and community. The second part of the paper focuses on the hierarchies of belonging that operate within a given national setting. Of particular interest is the largely taken-for-granted status of the ethnic majority and the degree to which it underpins claims to belonging and entitlement that are used to secure key allocative and authoritative resources.Item type | Current library | Home library | Class number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item reservations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Article | Electronic publication | Electronic publication | Available |
<p>British Journal of Sociology Vol. 64 no. 1 (Mar. 2013), p. 81-98.</p> <p>Available in the library. See journal shelves.</p> <p>Available online.</p>
This paper explores the reasons why national forms of identification and organization (might) matter in the contemporary era. In contrast to the majority of macro-sociological work dealing with this topic, I develop an analytical framework that draws together recent research on everyday nationalism with micro-sociological and psychological studies pointing to the importance of routine practices, institutional arrangements and symbolic systems in contributing to a relatively settled sense of identity, place and community. The second part of the paper focuses on the hierarchies of belonging that operate within a given national setting. Of particular interest is the largely taken-for-granted status of the ethnic majority and the degree to which it underpins claims to belonging and entitlement that are used to secure key allocative and authoritative resources.
There are no comments on this title.