Image from Google Jackets

International framework agreements and industrial relations governance : Global rhetoric versus local realities Journal

By: Niforou, ChristinaMaterial type: TextTextPublication details: British Journal of Industrial Relations 2012Description: Journal articleISSN: 1467-8543Subject(s): Law | Industrial relations - InternationalDDC classification: Journals Online access: Open e-book (Ruskin students only) Summary: The article discusses the local impact of international framework agreements (IFAs). It presents findings from empirical research carried out in two Spanish MNCs, and it examines how the commitments stipulated by the texts of the IFAs translate in local practice in different subsidiaries in Central and South America. The article follows the policy cycle of both agreements, and it further evaluates them as emerging private institutions of global industrial relations governance. The main findings reveal a paradox. The generic character of IFAs encourages corporate consent for their adoption, but, in practice, it gives precedence to local laws and hence renders the enforcement of compliance difficult, and, in some cases, unfeasible. And where local laws contravene or lack compatibility with International Labour Organization conventions, the central premise of IFAs as instruments of global governance is largely undermined.
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Class number Status Date due Barcode Item reservations
Article Article Electronic publication Electronic publication Available
Total reservations: 0

<p>British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 50 no.&nbsp;2 (Sep 2012), p. 352-373</p> <p>Available in the library. See journal shelves.</p> <p>Available online.&nbsp;</p>

The article discusses the local impact of international framework agreements (IFAs). It presents findings from empirical research carried out in two Spanish MNCs, and it examines how the commitments stipulated by the texts of the IFAs translate in local practice in different subsidiaries in Central and South America. The article follows the policy cycle of both agreements, and it further evaluates them as emerging private institutions of global industrial relations governance. The main findings reveal a paradox. The generic character of IFAs encourages corporate consent for their adoption, but, in practice, it gives precedence to local laws and hence renders the enforcement of compliance difficult, and, in some cases, unfeasible. And where local laws contravene or lack compatibility with International Labour Organization conventions, the central premise of IFAs as instruments of global governance is largely undermined.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.